PCC Presentation and L.A. Times Editorial on Book Selection Process



Book presentation and signing to take place at Pasadena City College Tuesday, March 30, 12:00 PM

Join us on Tuesday, March 30, 2010 from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the CC Lounge at Pasadena City College (PCC) for my book presentation and discussion.

Address: 1570 E. Colorado Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91106


Textbook cases
As Texas shows, school book content must not be left to interest groups. California, take note.
March 28, 2010

Oh, those disingenuous Texans. Pretending to bring ideological balance to history textbooks when what they’re really doing is weighting the books so heavily with conservative mores, you’d expect the state’s backpack-laden school children to list to the right.

If the revisions proposed by the conservative faction of the Texas Board of Education are adopted in May, the state’s textbooks will raise the study of the inaugural speech of Confederate President Jefferson Davis to the same level as that of Abraham Lincoln. They will downplay the role of Thomas Jefferson, in part because he coined the phrase “separation of church and state,” and will imply that the Founding Fathers were Christian even though historians have found evidence that not all of them held Christian beliefs. The internment of a relatively small number of people of German and Italian heritage during World War II would be emphasized to make it appear as though there wasn’t a racial component to interning more than 100,000 Japanese Americans. This amounts to just plain disinformation.

Before Californians look down their noses, though, they should consider the rules governing this state’s textbooks. The state regulates the portrayal of genders, minority groups, the elderly and the disabled by requiring proportional representation that also cannot show any group in a negative light. Thus, as education expert Diane Ravitch writes, the elderly must be portrayed as fit and lively even if reality tells us that some cope with illness and disability. Publishers have been discouraged from portraying people in poor countries as poor — because that would stereotype those nations — and told to soften language on AIDS in Africa so as not to reflect badly on that continent.

A veto threat by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger stopped a 2006 bill that would have required textbooks to show a diversity of sexual orientation and include “the contributions of people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender to the total development of California and the United States,” basing choices of important people not solely on their accomplishments but on their sexual orientation.

Each textbook adoption in the state becomes a battle in which religious, ethnic and other groups demand changes so that they are seen in a more positive light. In 2006, a group of Hindus wanted to change social studies books to say that women historically had “different” rights in India, not fewer, despite practices such as child marriage, bride harassment and unequal property rights, and to eliminate certain information about the caste system, even though scholars insisted that the information was correct as written. The state agreed to the changes — until an opposing group took issue. That’s not to mention the time the state rejected a children’s reader because it included “The Little Engine That Could,” a classic story in which the train is portrayed as male — gender stereotyping.

Nor are these the only emotional disputesover textbooks. In 2001, the government of Japan approved a textbook that defended that nation’s actions during World War II and downplayed the 1937 massacre in Nanjing. The textbook drew heated protest from China. Last year, politicians in Japan and South Korea began exploring the possibility of writing a joint history textbook with China to be used in all three nations, but as one Japanese official put it, “The countries have been unable to agree on historical matters.”

In the debate over what the nation’s children should be taught, we all view ourselves as moral purists, the people who want schools to teach facts as well as the skills and ethical values that will enable the next generation to succeed. The problem is that we can’t agree on what those skills and ethical values are, or, for that matter, on which facts are important and sometimes what those facts are.

In California, textbooks might offer repeated lessons on the great diversity of race and religion, but what about diversity of thought? There are elements of the Texas revisions that are obviously ridiculous, but there are others that clearly would bring more balance to education. We wouldn’t object to teaching about modern-day conservative groups such as the Moral Majority, one of the proposed additions. Students should learn about the breadth of opinion in this country. It’s also appropriate for teenagers to debate the value of international treaties, as the Texas board wants them to.

The problem is that these decisions are left in the hands of politicians and appointed board members who often know little about education and less about history. The resulthasn’t been simply a slanting of textbook material but a simultaneous flattening of it. Publishers are so intent on meeting the long list of minutia demanded by states such as California and Texas that they have neglected to produce engaging books. Strange to say, the word “history” has its roots in the Greek word meaning narrative or learning by inquiry. Modern education has removed both.

We agree that textbooks need to be inclusive, unlike earlier versions that depicted white, middle-class people almost exclusively, down to the illustrations of children in elementary math problems. But when attempts to push one viewpoint or another distort the curriculum and reduce its accuracy, all students are harmed.

California and Texas have a disproportionate impact on the nation’s textbooks because they are the largest of the two dozen or so states that adopt textbooks statewide. And because of the two states’ complicated micromanagement of what the books can say and illustrate, it is the biggest publishing houses that are best able to work with them — and to sell the resulting books across the country. Schools are left with a lack of variety and little competition in the industry.

Textbook information should be compiled by scholars and written by talented storytellers, not by politicians, interest groups or publishers’ corporate committees. The books should awaken children not just to the diversity of people but the diversity of opinions in our nation. We agree with Ravitch that part of the problem is statewide textbook adoption. If school districts were empowered to pick their own books, allowing a more competitive textbook market to thrive, there would be less opportunity for lobbyists of any stripe to have undue influence over the process. What we should ask of districts is that they produce results — educated young adults — not that they do it according to a rigid formula. Increased competition from smaller publishers would encourage the publication of richer learning materials — the textbook revision that schools need most.

Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times

  1. What a superb content !

  2. I truly like going through this website, particularly this information

  3. Nice post — thanks for sharing.

  4. you have a good taste.

  5. Pretty insightful post. Never thought that it was this simple after all. I had spent a good deal of my time looking for someone to explain this subject clearly and you’re the only one that ever did that. Kudos to you! Keep it up

  6. Easily, the post is actually the best on this deserving topic. I fit in with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your upcoming updates.

  7. Thanks for this article, it’s very good information. I like reading about this subject, keep up the good work!

  8. Thanks for the informative post. It helped me a lot. May the Force be with you.

  9. You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your opinion.

  10. Hi. I go through a few of one¡¯s other posts and wished to understand in the event you would be interested in exchanging blogroll links?

  11. Okay article. I just became aware of your blog and desired to say I have really enjoyed reading your opinions. Any way I¡¯ll be subscribing in your feed and Lets hope you post again soon.

  12. You can definitely see your enthusiasm in the work you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren?¡¥t afraid to say how they believe. Always go after your heart.

  13. I’ve never heard of this before. I’ll make sure to find out more.

  14. I really like your blog and i really appreciate the excellent quality content you are posting here for free for your online readers. Can you tell us which blog platform you are using?

  15. Hi This is a nice production !!! Thanks

  16. I really fondness the matter to you shared. Thank you pro rearrangement.

  17. I love when I have free time to check out blogs online. I learn a lot from then and many are very funny. Keeping a smile on my face while relaxing is always a pleasure! Thanks for sharing yours.

  18. This is some really excellent stuff. I’m amazed by the quality of your site

  19. Is this something you think that would be very useful?

  20. I really love following these updates It just makes the afternoon.

  21. Hey Buddy, You haven’t left me with words to praise you. Such a wonderful article you have man! You, my friends, ROCK!!

  22. Thanks, I’ve been reading a lot of similar articles lately.

  23. Bing led me to this blog post, and it is absolutely what I was looking for.

  24. I really like your writing style, and I’m hoping for more blog posts like this one.

  25. Thanks, I’ve been reading a lot of similar articles lately.

  26. I have got to hand it to you, you did a good job. The information is very appreciated.

  27. interesting blog. It would be great if you can provide more details about it. Thanks you

  28. Thank you for keeping us updated. I really appreciate it and find all the information very useful.

  29. Thanks for sharing, I found this story while searching for free lyrics, interesting comments and great points made.

  30. Wow, I think what you mentioned earlier may be very true. Displays what I’m experiencing. Well since I am already right here, ponder whether you’d be variety sufficient to exchange hyperlinks with my site. I shall be placing your hyperlink in the blogroll section, and I hope that our hyperlink exchange can assist us make our blogs better. Hope you’ll be able to fulfill my humble request.

  31. This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.

  32. Hello,hi it´s just i enjoy your original blog, I wuold feel very honored if you would want me to write a site review about your great site in my little would you allow me that? Bookstore Christian

  33. I’m going to coat-tail on what “Very Evolved” said… The way you connect to your audience is… Know who you are writing to. You need to pick a Target Audience and stick to them. You wouldn’t write to an audience of 14yr olds the same way you would write to an audience of 60yr olds.

  34. Hello, I don’t normally post comments on blogs, as I wish to learn only. But I find the article that you’ve written earlier has very insightful info, and I discover it very informational. Anyway, I am questioning whether or not you are open for hyperlink exchange, as I hope that we will agree on a mutual link change agreement. Hope to listen to a constructive reply from you, and have a terrific day!

  35. I much like your response about this issue. You dealt with the subject very well and also have won me over as a reader. Continue the great content and I am going to make sure to notify my friends about your website.

  36. I truly much like your response with this subject. You covered the subject perfectly and also have won me over as a reader. Keep up the good information and I’ll be sure to notify my friends about your site.

  37. One of the top I have browsed so far. Everything was well thought of and appropriately written down. The best of luck in all your endeavors.

  38. Very cool site and I just bookmarked ya too!

  39. Wonderful journey and experience.

  40. I like your response on this issue. You covered the subject perfectly and have won me over as a reader. Keep up the great information and I will be sure to tell my buddies about your blog.

  41. I really like your response on this issue. You dealt with the subject very well and have won me over as a reader. Carry on the good content and I am going to make sure to inform my friends about your site.

  42. If you enjoyed this site you’ll almost certainly like this site too: http://www.winfreegiftcardsonline.com . Its a nice site for earning gift vouchers on the web.

  43. Helo there, well I find that your argued subject is rather serious as it highlights lots of good data. Well, was curious whether you would willing to exchange web links with my website, as I am looking to build contacts to further enlarge and gain ground for my web space. I do not mind you stationing my links at the homepage, just getting this links on this page is good and sufficient. Furthermore, would you be kind enough contact me at my web portal if you are keen in exchanging links with me, I would really appreciate that. Thank you to you and I hope to get a reply from you very soon!

  44. I feel like I’m constantly looking for interesting things to read about a variety of subjects, but I manage to include your blog among my reads every day because you have honest entries that I look forward to. Here’s hoping there’s a lot more great material coming!

  45. I always learn something new

  46. I rarly comment on blogs but I really like yours.Its hard to find good bloggers these days … everyone seems to be doing it for the money :(

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>